 |



"Subaru of New England, Inc. operates
in an arena with established state and national trade associations.
As helpful as those industry organizations can be, they represent
many competing businesses with different priorities. As General
Counsel, I felt SNE needed individualized representation on Beacon
Hill. The Suffolk Group has ensured that its perspective was heard.
Due to The Suffolk Group’s efforts over the years, SNE has had a
legislative impact that is positive for both it and the larger
community."
Kathleen M. Genova, Esq.
Vice President & General Counsel
Subaru of New England, Inc.
|
|
Subaru of New England
Challenge
The Massachusetts Legislature proposed comprehensive legislation
seeking to reduce and control the use of mercury products in the
Commonwealth. Included in the bill were specific provisions related
to automobile manufacturers, such as a prohibition on the sale of
new motor vehicles with mercury-added vehicle switches and a
requirement that manufacturers bear the cost of removing
mercury-added switches from automobiles. Subaru of New England, a
local “automobile distributor” for Subaru of America (SofA), was
included within the bill’s definition of manufacturer, and as such
would be faced with onerous burdens, even though SofA is the actual
manufacturer.
Solution
The Suffolk Group devised a lobbying strategy of amending the
proposed legislation during House and Senate debate to exempt
distributors from the definition of “automobile manufacturer”. In
addition to drafting the amendment language, a message was developed
based upon the fact that a distributor was never intended to be
treated the same as an international auto manufacturer. Relying upon
the fact that SNE is the only distributor in Massachusetts, as well
as its status as a significant contributor to the state’s economy,
we were successful in obtaining the critical support of the House
and Senate Chairmen of the Natural Resources Committee, as well as
the House Speaker and Senate President.
Success
Through the Suffolk Group’s lobbying efforts, Subaru of New England
was ultimately exempted by the Legislature from the bill’s
definition of “automobile manufacturer”, thereby excluding it from
the costly and difficult burdens placed upon such manufacturers.
|
|
|